Financial-Discipline.jpg

The health of any government, especially at the local level, is inextricably tied to its ability to manage public resources effectively. But in many parts of Nigeria and across Africa, financial management systems remain underdeveloped, opaque, or overly reliant on manual processes. This not only limits service delivery but also exposes institutions to inefficiencies, leakages, and public distrust.

Local governments sit at the frontline of development, responsible for the daily realities of citizens, from infrastructure and healthcare to education and waste management. Yet many operate without robust financial accountability systems or clear strategies for generating sustainable revenue. As national budgets tighten and donor flows become increasingly conditional, the ability to internally mobilize and responsibly manage resources has become a defining factor for local government resilience.

What’s needed is a two-fold shift.

First, financial accountability must move from theory to practice. This means institutionalizing clear frameworks for budgeting, expenditure tracking, and public financial reporting. Equipping finance directors, auditors, and local executives with the skills to apply these frameworks in real-world contexts is critical.

Second, governments must rethink revenue generation—not just in terms of raising taxes, but in unlocking value from local assets. Whether through tourism, agriculture, mineral resources, or digital platforms, local governments must design innovative, context-appropriate strategies to boost internally generated revenue while ensuring fairness and inclusivity.

This approach builds more than financial muscle; it builds autonomy and credibility.

Through its Financial Management & Budgeting programs, H. Pierson supports subnational entities in creating transparent, efficient, and future-ready financial ecosystems. Because when local governance is backed by financial discipline, communities thrive—and development becomes a lived reality, not a distant plan.


etihics.jpg

In today’s governance environment—marked by increased citizen awareness, digital transparency, and economic uncertainty—trust has become one of the most valuable currencies a public institution can hold. But trust is not simply granted; it is earned, consistently, through the deliberate application of ethical leadership.

Unfortunately, across many tiers of government, ethics often takes a back seat to policy urgency and political expediency. The result is a growing deficit of public confidence, with citizens disengaged, development partners wary, and internal accountability structures weakened. From contract awarding and procurement processes to service delivery and citizen engagement, ethical lapses silently erode the effectiveness of government actions, no matter how well-intended.

To reverse this trend, ethical governance must be more than an aspirational value—it must be a practical, strategic focus embedded into institutional culture. This requires more than just codes of conduct. It demands capacity-building programs that help public servants understand not only what is expected of them, but why integrity-driven leadership is key to sustainable progress. Ethics training must be scenario-based, contextualized, and aligned with the realities of everyday government work.

Moreover, systems must be re-engineered to reinforce ethical choices, from clear escalation mechanisms and whistleblower protections to the automation of sensitive processes that reduce discretionary abuse.

As government leaders face growing pressure to show impact and legitimacy, ethical governance is emerging not just as a compliance issue but as a leadership imperative. When institutions operate transparently and with integrity, public trust follows—and with it, the political and social capital needed to drive meaningful reform.

H. Pierson’s Ethical Governance solutions support government leaders in building cultures that uphold public trust, because leadership without integrity is a risk no nation can afford.


Capability-blog.png

Across Africa—and particularly in Nigeria—the past year has underscored a single, uncomfortable truth: governance without capacity is a broken promise. From the ripple effects of subsidy removal and currency reform, to rising inflation, youth unemployment, and deepening public trust deficits, leaders at all levels are being challenged not only to design better policies—but to deliver them with competence, clarity, and compassion. Add to that the pressures of digital transformation, climate-driven migration, security concerns, and international trade shifts, and it becomes clear: this is a defining moment for the African public sector. But while policy is shaped in documents, impact is shaped in people.

The Silent Challenge: Leadership and Institutional Readiness

Often, the loudest reforms fail not for lack of vision, but due to execution gaps:

-Weak financial controls at the subnational level -Misaligned local development efforts -Ineffective engagement with citizens

-Limited capacity to monitor digital transformation

-Ethical lapses that erode public confidence

In the background of every major reform or geopolitical shift lies a crucial question: are public servants equipped to carry the weight of national change?

The Opportunity: A Different Kind of Investment

Nation-building doesn’t just happen in parliaments—it happens in meeting rooms, classrooms, and council chambers, where government officials make thousands of small decisions that shape lives.

To ensure those decisions reflect vision, resilience, and strategy, there must be ongoing investment in capacity building—not just for technical skills, but for leadership, ethics, digital literacy, public finance, and stakeholder engagement.

This is not about ticking boxes. It’s about building a public sector that can hold the line under pressure, adapt quickly, and lead with credibility.

As Africa stands at the intersection of reform and renaissance, the quality of our governance will determine whether our institutions can deliver stability, inclusion, and sustainable growth.

Capacity must come before complexity.

It’s not only the right thing to do; it may be the most strategic investment of our time. Are you interested in exploring public sector leadership, financial accountability, or governance readiness? Let’s have a conversation.

learningsolutions@hpierson.com


e04b24fe66.jpg
Oct 10 – Canada’s TD Bank (TD.TO), agreed to pay a combined $3 billion in penalties on Thursday as part of a settlement with U.S. authorities over charges it failed to monitor and prevent money laundering.
The issue highlights a recurring challenge in the financial industry. Intermediaries like banks are required to prevent the flow of funds for illicit activities, but in some cases, they have failed to detect crimes because of inadequate compliance systems or huge transaction volumes.
 

Here is an overview of some of the largest penalties imposed by U.S. regulators to resolve money laundering probes in the last decade:

BINANCE:
Binance chief Changpeng Zhao stepped down in November 2023 and pled guilty to breaking U.S. anti-money laundering laws as part of a $4.3 billion settlement resolving a years-long probe into the world’s largest crypto exchange.
 
DANSKE BANK (DANSKE.CO)
Denmark’s Danske Bank (DANSKE.CO), opens new tab agreed to pay more than $2 billion in January 2023 to end probes into anti-money laundering failures as part of a guilty plea. The payout was divided between the U.S. government and Danish authorities.
 
SOCIETE GENERALE (SOGN.PA), 
France’s Societe Generale committed to pay $1.4 billion in 2018 to settle investigations into its handling of dollar transactions in violation of U.S. sanctions against Cuba and other countries, and a separate dispute over anti-money laundering regulations.
 
GOLDMAN SACHS (GS.N)
Goldman Sachs agreed to pay $2.9 billion over its role in Malaysia’s 1MDB corruption scandal in 2020. The settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice and other U.S. and overseas regulators resolved a probe into the role its bankers played in helping steal cash from the Malaysian state fund, which Goldman helped raise.
 
STANDARD CHARTERED (STAN.L)
Standard Chartered settled on paying $1.1 billion to U.S. and British authorities in 2019 for conducting illegal financial transactions that violated sanctions against Iran and other countries.
The bank also paid U.S. authorities $667 million in 2012 for illegally moving millions of dollars through the U.S. financial system on behalf of customers in Iran, Sudan, Libya and Myanmar.
 
DEUTSCHE BANK (DBKGn.DE), 
Deutsche Bank agreed to pay $630 million in fines to U.S. and UK regulators in 2017, for failing to prevent around $10 billion in suspicious trades being laundered out of Russia.
COMMERZBANK (CBKG.DE),
Commerzbank agreed to pay U.S. authorities $1.45 billion in 2015 to resolve an investigation of its dealings with Iran and other sanctioned countries as well as a separate probe of its money laundering controls.
 
Source: Reuters.com

2147985365.jpg

It comes with encouraging news and a note of caution: Overall dollar losses are down $9 billion from the previous study year, but two decades of studying identity fraud show that the ups and downs require financial services providers and consumers’ ongoing vigilance to protect personally identifiable information.

The report sponsors share Javelin’s commitment to fraud prevention and education. Sponsors are AARP, Equifax, and FIS at the platinum level; TransUnion at the gold level; and BioCatch at the silver level. Javelin maintains independence in its data collection, analysis, and reporting.

The downward movement of the loss figures is a testament to the relentless efforts of the financial services industry to keep criminals at bay. However, criminals continually adjust their tactics, so much work remains to dramatically reduce the impact of identity fraud across the industry.

“Describing the current state of identity fraud trends as the butterfly effect is fitting,” said John Buzzard, Javelin’s lead fraud and security analyst and the report’s author. “Even minor occurrences can set off a chain reaction that has a significant impact on the daily lives and habits of identity fraud victims who may also be feeling ambivalent in the wake of a handful of recent bank failures such as Silicon Valley Bank.”

Highlights From This Year’s Report:

  • Total identity fraud losses were $43 billion. That’s down from $52 billion the year before, a decline of 17%.
  • Identity fraud scams victimized fewer people. Javelin credits this to consumer outreach by financial services and consumer advocacy groups, and stronger fraud prevention tactics at banks and credit unions. The decline in number of victims was 2 million, even as significant challenges persist in the overall battle against identity fraud and scams.
  • Identity fraud has a disproportionately severe impact on non-white households. Exposure to data breaches affects 27% of Hispanic households and 26% of Black households—a considerable difference from White households—and the gap widens when compared with Asian households. The report describes the heavy toll identity fraud exacts on its victims, explores several contributing factors, and provides recommendations based on these findings.
  • Significant reduction in new-account fraud. This is an indication that financial service providers are focusing more intently on identity and authentication practices through the use of fraud detection technology.

This year, for the first time, the report gathered victim impact statements, putting a human face to crimes that often shatter confidence, shred credit, and harm long-term financial well-being.

“It’s devastating to read impact statements from identity fraud victims, especially people who say things like, ‘After my identity fraud experience, my accounts were overdrawn, and I couldn’t pay my utility bills or buy food,’” added Buzzard.

This year’s report includes a 20th-anniversary retrospective that illustrates how technical innovations, societal changes, and economic indicators have influenced the past two decades of identity fraud activity and Javelin’s subsequent research.


89015.jpg

The Growing Imperative for Robust Compliance 

Financial crimes, identity fraud, and money laundering are escalating at an unprecedented rate, threatening the integrity of global financial systems. With over $10 billion in AML-related fines imposed annually and identity fraud losses exceeding $52 billion globally, financial institutions, fintech companies, and corporate entities must adopt stringent compliance frameworks. Regulators worldwide continue to tighten KYC (Know Your Customer) and AML (Anti-Money Laundering) requirements, making governance and risk management an essential board-level priority. 

Understanding KYC/AML and Digital Identity Verification 

KYC and AML compliance involve rigorous processes to verify customer identities, assess risks, and monitor transactions to prevent financial crimes. Digital identity verification further enhances these efforts by leveraging AI, biometrics, and blockchain technology to authenticate identities in real time, reducing fraud and improving compliance efficiency. 

Key Components of Effective KYC/AML Compliance: 

  • Customer Due Diligence (CDD) & Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): Ensuring thorough vetting of clients to detect suspicious activities. 
  • Transaction Monitoring: Identifying anomalies and red flags that could indicate illicit transactions. 
  • Sanctions & PEP Screening: Screening individuals and entities against regulatory watchlists. 
  • Reporting & Record-Keeping: Ensuring compliance with legal requirements for documentation and reporting. 

The Rising Cost of Non-Compliance 

Failing to adhere to regulatory mandates has severe consequences, including: 

  • Heavy Financial Penalties: Institutions collectively paid over $5 billion in AML-related fines in 2023 alone. 
  • Reputational Damage: High-profile compliance failures erode stakeholder trust and investor confidence. 
  • Legal & Regulatory Consequences: Non-compliance can lead to business restrictions, loss of licenses, and even criminal prosecution. 

How Board Members & Executives Can Strengthen Compliance 

Given the increasing regulatory expectations, board members and executives must: 

  • Ensure their organizations implement comprehensive AML policies and risk-based frameworks. 
  • Oversee the adoption of digital identity verification tools to enhance fraud detection. 
  • Stay informed about evolving compliance regulations and emerging risks. 
  • Foster a culture of compliance through continuous training and organizational awareness. 

138090-1200x746.jpg

Board evaluation is a critical process that helps organizations assess the effectiveness of their boards of directors. In Nigeria, board evaluation is becoming increasingly important as the country’s corporate governance landscape continues to evolve. However, despite its importance, board evaluation in Nigeria faces several challenges. This article highlights some of the key challenges of board evaluation in Nigeria and proposes solutions.

Challenges of Board Evaluation in Nigeria

1. Regulatory Framework

The regulatory framework in Nigeria also poses a challenge to board evaluation. While the Nigerian Code of Corporate Governance recommends that boards should be evaluated regularly, there is no clear guidance on how to conduct these evaluations.

2. Cultural and Social Barriers

Cultural and social barriers also pose a significant challenge to board evaluation in Nigeria. In some cases, board members may be reluctant to criticize or evaluate their colleagues due to cultural or social norms. This can lead to ineffective evaluations and a lack of accountability.

3. Lack of Awareness and Understanding

One of the major challenges of board evaluation in Nigeria is the lack of awareness and understanding of the process among board members and stakeholders. Many boards in Nigeria are not aware of the benefits of board evaluation, and as such, they do not prioritize it.

4. Limited Expertise and Resources

Another challenge facing board evaluation in Nigeria is the limited expertise and resources available to conduct effective evaluations. Many organizations in Nigeria lack the necessary skills and resources to conduct thorough board evaluations, which can lead to ineffective evaluations.

Solutions to Challenges of Board Evaluation in Nigeria

1. Regulatory Guidance

To address the challenge of regulatory framework, it is essential to provide clear guidance on how to conduct board evaluations. The Nigerian Corporate Governance Code should be reviewed to provide more specific guidance on board evaluation.

2. Use of Technology

o address the challenge of cultural and social barriers, it is essential to leverage technology to facilitate board evaluations. Online evaluation tools can help to reduce bias and ensure that evaluations are conducted objectively.

3. Awareness and Education

To address the challenge of lack of awareness and understanding, it is essential to educate board members and stakeholders on the importance and benefits of board evaluation. This can be achieved through training programs, workshops, and seminars.

4. Development of Evaluation Framework

To address the challenge of limited expertise and resources, it is essential to develop a board evaluation framework that is tailored to the Nigerian context. This framework should provide guidance on how to conduct effective board evaluations.

Conclusion

Board evaluation is a critical process that helps organizations assess the effectiveness of their boards of directors. In Nigeria, board evaluation faces several challenges, including lack of awareness and understanding, limited expertise and resources, cultural and social barriers, and regulatory framework. However, these challenges can be addressed through awareness and education, development of evaluation framework, use of technology, and regulatory guidance. By addressing these challenges, organizations in Nigeria can conduct effective board evaluations that lead to improved governance and performance.


real-estate.jpg

Short-Term

1. Market Research and Analysis: Understand demand and supply dynamics.
2. Diversification of Portfolio: Explore residential, commercial, industrial, and hospitality sectors.
3. Land Acquisition and Development: Secure strategic land banks.
4. Partnership and Collaboration: Foster partnerships with local and international investors.
5. Regulatory Compliance: Align with the regulatory bodies 
 

Medium-Term

1. Affordable Housing: Develop affordable housing solutions.
2. Sustainable Development: Incorporate green building technologies.
3. Technology Integration: Leverage PropTech for efficient operations.
4. Expansion into New Markets: Enter new geographic markets.
5. Talent Development: Invest in staff training and capacity building.
 

Long-Term

1. Integrated City Development: Develop self-sustaining cities.
2. Infrastructure Development: Invest in supporting infrastructure (e.g., roads, utilities).
3. Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): Explore REITs for capital raising.
4. International Expansion: Enter global markets.
5. Innovation and R&D: Invest in new technologies and construction methods.
 

Regulatory and Policy Considerations

1. Housing Policy: Align with government initiatives.
2. Land Use regulation: Understand and navigate land ownership regulations.
3. Environmental Regulations: Comply with environmental standards.
4. Taxation and Fiscal Policy: Navigate tax regulations.
5. Industry Standards: Establish and maintain professional standards.
 

Financial Considerations

1. Access to Finance: Explore funding options (e.g., debt, equity).
2. Risk Management: Mitigate market, credit, and operational risks.
3. Cost Optimization: Improve operational efficiency.
4. Return on Investment: Optimize profitability.
5. Investor Relations: Foster strong relationships with investors.
 

Operational Efficiency

1. Project Management: Enhance project delivery timelines.
2. Supply Chain Management: Streamline procurement processes.
3. Customer Service: Improve customer satisfaction.
4. Maintenance and Facilities Management: Ensure quality maintenance.
5. Performance Monitoring: Track key performance indicators (KPIs).
 

Digital Transformation

1. Digital Marketing: Leverage online platforms for marketing.
2. Property Technology (PropTech): Adopt innovative technologies.
3. Data Analytics: Utilize data-driven insights.
4. Online Platforms: Establish online presence for sales and rentals.
5. Cybersecurity: Ensure data protection.
 
By addressing these strategy issues, real estate companies in Africa can:
 
– Enhance market share
– Improve operational efficiency
– Increase profitability
– Align with regulatory requirements
– Achieve sustainability
 
And ultimately achieve their 2025 business goals.

sawefqe.jpg

Short-Term

1. Crop Diversification: Explore new high-demand crops.
2. Mechanization and Technology: Adopt efficient farming equipment and technology.
3. Irrigation and Water Management: Develop sustainable water management systems.
4. Market Access and Linkages: Establish strong market relationships.
5. Regulatory Compliance: Align with Agricultural Quarantine Service and other regulatory bodies.
 

Medium-Term

1. Value Chain Development: Integrate processing, storage, and logistics.
2. Investment in Research and Development: Develop new crop varieties and farming techniques.
3. Partnerships and Collaborations: Foster strategic partnerships with local and international companies.
4. Capacity Building: Enhance staff skills and training.
5. Sustainability and Environmental Practices: Implement environmentally friendly farming practices.
 

Long-Term

1. Integration into Global Value Chains: Participate in international agricultural production networks.
2. Agricultural Industrialization: Develop agro-industrial parks and processing zones.
3. Regional Cooperation: Collaborate with neighboring countries.
4. Digital Agriculture: Leverage technology for precision farming.
5. Youth Engagement and Empowerment: Attract and train young farmers.
 

Regulatory and Policy Considerations

1. Agricultural Policy Framework: Align with the government’s agricultural policy.
2. Land Reform: Understand and navigate land ownership regulations.
3. Trade Agreements: Utilize bilateral and multilateral trade agreements.
4. Environmental Regulations: Comply with environmental regulations.
5. Taxation and Fiscal Policy: Navigate tax regulations.
 

Financial Considerations

 
1. Access to Finance: Explore funding options.
2. Risk Management: Mitigate market, credit, and operational risks.
3. Insurance and Crop Protection: Develop risk management strategies.
4. Cost Reduction: Improve operational efficiency.
5. Return on Investment: Optimize profitability.
 

Operational Efficiency

 
1. Supply Chain Management: Streamline input procurement and output marketing.
2. Inventory Management: Optimize stock levels.
3. Equipment Maintenance: Implement predictive maintenance.
4. Quality Control: Enhance product quality.
5. Performance Monitoring: Track key performance indicators (KPIs).
 

Digital Transformation

1. Digital Farming Platforms: Leverage technology for precision farming.
2. Data Analytics: Utilize data-driven insights.
3. E-Commerce Platforms: Establish online market presence.
4. Automation: Implement process automation.
5. Cybersecurity: Ensure data protection.
 
By addressing these strategy issues, agricultural companies in Nigeria can:
 
– Enhance productivity
– Increase market share
– Improve operational efficiency
– Align with regulatory requirements
– Achieve sustainability
And ultimately achieve their 2025 business goals.

export.jpg

Short-Term

1. Diversification of Export Products: Identify new high-demand products.
2. Market Expansion: Explore new international markets.
3. Compliance with Regulatory Requirements: Align with Nigerian Export Promotion Council (NEPC) and other regulatory bodies.
4. Logistics and Supply Chain Optimization: Improve efficiency and reduce costs.
5. Currency Risk Management: Mitigate foreign exchange volatility.
 

Medium-Term

1. Value Addition and Processing: Develop processing capabilities for raw materials.
2. Investment in Technology: Leverage digital platforms for trade facilitation.
3. Partnerships and Collaborations: Foster strategic partnerships with local and international companies.
4. Capacity Building: Enhance staff skills and training.
5. Brand Development: Establish strong Nigerian brands.
 

Long-Term

1. Integration into Global Value Chains: Participate in international production networks.
2. Diversification of Export Markets: Reduce dependence on traditional markets.
3. Development of Export-Oriented Infrastructure: Invest in ports, transportation, and storage facilities.
4. Research and Development: Invest in product development and innovation.
5. Regional Cooperation: Collaborate with neighboring countries.
 

Regulatory and Policy Considerations

1. The Export Promotion Guidelines: Comply with export regulations.
2. African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA): Leverage opportunities.
3. World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreements: Understand and comply.
4. Taxation and Fiscal Policy: Navigate tax regulations.
5. Trade Agreements: Utilize bilateral and multilateral agreements.
 
 

Financial Considerations

1. Access to Finance: Explore funding options.
2. Risk Management: Mitigate market, credit, and operational risks.
3. Foreign Exchange Management: Optimize FX transactions.
4. Cost Reduction: Improve operational efficiency.
5. Return on Investment: Optimize profitability.
 

Operational Efficiency

1. Supply Chain Management: Streamline procurement processes.
2. Inventory Management: Optimize stock levels.
3. Shipping and Logistics: Improve delivery times.
4. Quality Control: Enhance product quality.
5. Performance Monitoring: Track key performance indicators (KPIs).
 

Digital Transformation

1. E-Commerce Platforms: Leverage digital trade platforms.
2. Data Analytics: Utilize data-driven insights.
3. Digital Payment Systems: Adopt secure payment solutions.
4. Automation: Implement process automation.
5. Cybersecurity: Ensure data protection.
 
By addressing these strategy issues, exports trading companies in Africa can:
– Enhance competitiveness
– Increase export volumes
– Diversify products and markets
– Improve operational efficiency
– Align with regulatory requirements
 
And ultimately achieve their 2025 business goals.

Find us

35, Glover Road, Ikoyi, Lagos Nigeria.
info@hpierson.com
+234-8111661212 (WhatsApp)